Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
We introduce ARBOR, a parameter-efficient adaptation method for medical language models that conditionally selects rank-one components from a shared low-rank basis per question, guided by an additive gate combining question, specialty, and operation tags. This conditional selection mechanism demonstrably avoids an approximation floor observed in fixed updates, leading to improved performance on medical QA benchmarks. Across four datasets and Qwen3-8B, ARBOR achieves a mean accuracy of 69.69%, outperforming LoRA and MoELoRA, with its advantage growing significantly with increased specialty diversity.
Medical LLMs can achieve superior QA performance by dynamically selecting specialized adaptation components based on question context and clinical tags, surpassing static parameter-efficient methods.
Medical question answering spans specialties and clinical operations that may benefit from different adaptation directions. We propose ARBOR, a parameter-efficient method that selects rank-one components from a shared low-rank basis for each question. An additive gate combines question representations, specialty tags, operation tags, and their interaction; a learned coefficient scales the adapter residual. An illustrative separation under orthogonal, equiprobable subtasks shows how conditional selection can avoid an approximation floor faced by a fixed update with the same active rank. This result motivates the design without asserting a corresponding bound for medical corpora. On Qwen3-8B across CMB, CMExam, MedQA, and MedMCQA, five-seed experiments yield 69.69% mean accuracy across benchmarks, exceeding LoRA r16 and MoELoRA by 1.26 and 1.30 percentage points, respectively. The reported advantage over LoRA r16 increases from 0.08 to 1.94 points as training expands from one to seven specialties. Tag perturbations and atom masking support the usefulness of clinical routing, while atom clusters align with the supplied specialty labels (adjusted Rand index 0.62). Calibration, transfer, and measured costs further characterize the method. These findings support structured conditional adaptation for medical QA, while leaving clinical safety and broader deployment untested.
NUS