Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper reframes lossy compression in Federated Learning not as an error source but as a security signal, introducing "compression footprints" derived from reconstruction, directional, sparsity, and payload statistics to distinguish honest from malicious model updates. The authors operationalize this by developing CRAFT, a server-side robust aggregation method that leverages these footprints to suppress malicious influence under a strict honest-majority assumption, without requiring client-side metadata or knowledge of the number of attackers. Evaluation demonstrates CRAFT's effectiveness against various poisoning attacks, achieving competitive accuracy and highlighting compression's dual role in communication and security.
Lossy compression's inherent distortion patterns, not just update geometry, can reliably detect and mitigate model poisoning in federated learning.
Lossy compression is widely used in Federated Learning (FL) but is generally treated as an error source, while conventional poisoning defenses inspect update geometry. In this work, we instead treat the compressor's response as a security signal: the input-dependent distortion and payload behavior induced by lossy compression can expose differences between honest and attack-generated updates. We introduce the concept of a \emph{compression footprint}: the low-dimensional collection of reconstruction, directional, sparsity, and payload statistics induced by a lossy compressor. We characterize sufficient conditions under which compression footprints separate honest and malicious updates, and operationalize our findings in the CRAFT (\emph{Compression-guided Robust Aggregation via Footprint Trust}) server-side robust aggregation method. Crucially, under a strict honest-majority assumption, CRAFT uses server-verifiable footprints, requires no client-side metadata nor knowledge of the number of malicious clients, and adds no communication beyond the compressed FL pipeline. Moreover, while CRAFT assumes a strict honest majority, it does not require the number of malicious clients to be known in advance. We observe that error-bounded lossy compressor (EBLC) footprints provide stronger separation than Top-K footprints and that footprint trust suppresses malicious influence. We evaluate CRAFT under IID client data with 36\% malicious participation across six standard model-poisoning attacks, three datasets, and six robust aggregation baselines, finding that CRAFT consistently achieves the best accuracy in 7 out of 18 settings and within 1.7 percentage points of the best in the others. Our results show that lossy compression can serve as both a communication mechanism and a security signal for robust aggregation in FL.