Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper quantifies the data efficiency of kilometer-scale climate downscaling for extreme heat by training a U-Net with a structure-preserving loss on varying durations of reanalysis data. It establishes a linear error-distance scaling relation, RMSE = 0.83 + 2.95 d, which explains 90% of held-out error variance and predicts performance on unseen months. The findings demonstrate that optimizing training data duration based on climatological distance, rather than raw simulation volume, significantly improves downscaling accuracy and enables cost-effective kilometer-scale predictions for urban adaptation.
Kilometer-scale extreme heat downscaling accuracy scales linearly with climatological distance, not simulation volume, revealing a path to cost-effective urban adaptation.
Extreme heat is where urban adaptation needs kilometer-scale data the most, but the simulations training a downscaler can cost more than they save, and how much is needed has not been identified. We measured it with CASPER, a U-Net with a structure-preserving loss downscaling 32 km reanalysis to 1 km temperature, humidity and wind, across 24 configurations of one to eight months. Held-out error grows linearly with climatological distance to the training data, RMSE = 0.83 + 2.95 d, explaining 90% of its variance against 7% for volume and predicting unseen months in advance. On held-out extreme summer weeks CASPER preserves the fine-scale structure and cross-variable physics that matched-budget baselines degrade, and matches station observations during documented heat waves to within 1.8 K. Transfer to a new region degrades geographically; 11 days of local simulation cuts Vancouver's held-out error from 3.8 to 1.3 K. Training periods should span the target climate: the same accuracy for four times less simulation, putting kilometer-scale downscaling of extreme heat within reach of groups without large computing facilities.