Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees that grow via successive leaf attachments, considering scenarios with unknown or misspecified growth laws and a known horizon. For deterministic affine attachment forecasts with nonnegative degree reinforcement, the optimal threshold policy incurs a loss bounded by twice the cumulative expected conditional total-variation error relative to an online oracle. This bound, derived from a unit-span property of the Bellman continuation score, is independent of the horizon and is shown to be tight for a specific four-vertex example.
An optimal threshold policy for irrevocable matching in growing trees loses at most twice the total-variation error of the true growth law, even when forecasts are misspecified.
We study irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees revealed by successive leaf attachments, with a known horizon and an exogenous growth law that is misspecified or unknown. For deterministic affine attachment forecasts with nonnegative degree reinforcement, the optimal threshold policy loses at most twice the cumulative expected conditional total-variation error relative to an online oracle knowing the actual growth law. This follows from a unit-span property of the Bellman continuation score and has no additional horizon factor. A four-vertex example attains the coefficient two for the specified deterministic policy, and a two-model argument gives a lower bound linear in the model-error budget for arbitrary policies under general misspecification. For uniform-preferential attachment, the local error has an exact expression through the leaf count. When its constant mixture parameter is unknown, we estimate it from the same growing tree and update the threshold policy at geometric times. A parameter-sensitivity bound for individual Bellman prices and uniform degree-moment estimates yield expected regret $O(\sqrt{n}\log^2 n)$, using $O(n^2\log n)$ arithmetic operations and $O(n)$ stored entries. The exact minimax rate remains open.