Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To prevent small steering models from learning counterproductive advice from indiscriminate post-hoc reflection, the authors formulate AdviSD, which couples outcome-based reinforcement learning with targeted multi-turn self-distillation. The method is grounded in a theoretical proof showing that uncurated corrections dilute gradients for useful advice, resolving this via counterfactual advisor-side scoring that measures execution impact without requiring executor log-probabilities or extra rollouts. Directing frozen Gemini and Claude models with a Qwen3-8B advisor, AdviSD outperforms advisor-GRPO by 4.2–6.4% on BFCL-v3 and up to 5.1 points on EnvScaler while generalizing across distinct executor families.
Training a small advisor to steer frozen frontier LLMs actually degrades if it learns from every post-hoc correction—selectively distilling only the advice that causally shifts execution yields up to a 6.4% gain and robust cross-family model transfer.
A small trainable advisor can steer a frozen language-model executor using natural-language advice. In addition to learning from task rewards, the advisor can use feedback from completed interactions to improve its advice. However, a plausible correction need not change execution, yet learning from such corrections can still affect the advisor's future decisions in other contexts. In a shared-parameter model, we prove that such corrections can limit learning if their targets favor useful advice less strongly than those of other corrections. Keeping them less often than the rest improves the model's eventual performance compared to learning from every correction. Motivated by this, our method, Advisor Self-Distillation (AdviSD), pairs outcome-based reinforcement learning with self-distillation from a feedback-conditioned copy of the advisor selectively. Reflection proposes corrections, and the advisor scores the same recorded executor response with and without its issued advice, using the magnitude of the difference to select decisions for supervision. This approach does not require executor likelihoods or additional executor rollouts. Experiments with Qwen3-8B advisors for Gemini and Claude show that AdviSD outperforms advisor-GRPO by 4.2-6.4 percentage points on BFCL-v3 and by 3.9-5.1 score points on EnvScaler. The trained advisors generalize to out-of-domain tasks and transfer across different executor versions and model families. AdviSD also beats matched-count random selection, supporting the value of its selection rule.