Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To drastically cut the rollout budget required to evaluate rare failure modes, the authors derive fixed-design efficiency bounds for policy Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) and instantiate Tail-Influence Sampling (TIS) to allocate queries across modular transition kernels. By quantifying how conditional transition uncertainties propagate through recursive Bellman updates into lower-tail quantiles, TIS achieves oracle Neyman-optimal asymptotic variance while fully accounting for pilot estimation costs. The method reduces CVaR estimation MSE by 76% over standard rollouts in reinforcement learning environments and delivers a 2.4–3.4× MSE reduction in multi-step LLM benchmark evaluations.
Targeting evaluation compute at specific tail-sensitive transition kernels cuts policy CVaR estimation error by up to 76% compared to standard end-to-end rollouts.
Policies with similar mean returns can differ sharply in rare failures, yet estimating lower-tail conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) accurately can require many costly rollouts. When different conditional components of a stochastic workflow can be queried separately, we ask how to allocate a fixed evaluation budget to estimate a fixed policy's CVaR most accurately. We derive a tail influence for each queryable conditional law that aggregates how its uncertainty affects CVaR across every Bellman reuse. Its variance yields the fixed-design efficiency bound and the oracle Neyman allocation. Tail-Influence Sampling (TIS) estimates these influence scales from a pilot model and reallocates fresh queries toward kernels that matter most for the tail; a visitation-anchored variant protects against pilot underallocation. Under fixed dimension and a positive quantile margin, TIS attains oracle asymptotic variance and first-order MSE including pilot cost, while the anchored variant is within a factor two of the oracle. We also characterize an exact-grid regime in which tail- and mean-optimal allocations coincide. On CliffWalking, TIS reduces MSE by 41% versus learned occupancy and 76% versus complete rollouts at the same charged transition budget. In frozen language-model review workflows, anchored TIS beats an equally regularized mean-influence blend in 23 of 24 MMLU-Pro settings and reaches 2.4-3.4$\times$ lower MSE than rollouts on six-call FinQA reviews.