Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors evaluated the entire 4.23-million-example OpenOrca instruction dataset for task compliance using a five-pass ensemble of a 1.6T-parameter open-weight LLM judge (LongCat-2.0). The resulting CompOrca dataset isolates a high-precision unanimous noncompliance subset (1.28% of the corpus, 86.7% precision against human annotation) from unanimous compliance (94.75%) and ambiguous rows (3.97%). Crucially, the benchmark reveals that existing off-the-shelf refusal detection methods suffer from severe blind spots, exhibiting recall as low as 0.4% on instruction-tuning noncompliance.
Standard refusal detectors miss up to 99.6% of noncompliant instruction-tuning data, but multi-pass consensus from a 1.6T-parameter judge successfully isolates millions of latent refusals and evasions at 86.7% precision.
Studying how fine-tuning shapes refusal and noncompliance behaviour requires identifying training examples that refuse, evade or otherwise fail to fulfil the requested task. But existing annotation covers evaluation sets of a few thousand prompts at most. We present CompOrca, a compliance labelling over the entirety of the 4,233,923-example OpenOrca corpus. Every example was classified as compliant or noncompliant by five independent passes of an open-weight LLM judge (LongCat-2.0, 1.6T parameters), and the corpus is released as unanimous compliance (94.75%), unanimous noncompliance (1.28%), and nonunanimous rows (3.97%) along with the raw vote counts. A single pass flags 2.7-3.2% of the corpus as noncompliant, while only 1.28% is flagged by all five, allowing for filtering the most ambiguous samples. Against 450 human-annotated examples, 150 of them annotated twice (human-human $κ= 0.93$), the unanimous compliance and noncompliance labels are 97.3% and 86.7% precise, the latter a high-precision subset, not a complete enumeration, of noncompliance. Published refusal-detection methods recall only between 0.4% and 94.1% of the noncompliance class. We release the full corpus with its per-row labels and vote counts at https://huggingface.co/datasets/cemiu/CompOrca