Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper resolves the long-standing question of whether shifted primes preferentially concentrate their largest prime factors by establishing the bidirectional ordering of $P^+(p-1)$ versus $P^+(p+1)$. The authors unconditionally prove that both $P^+(p+1) > P^+(p-1)$ and $P^+(p-1) > P^+(p+1)$ hold for a strictly positive proportion of prime numbers. This unlocks bidirectional density results via a novel transfer mechanism that converts asymmetric, one-sided prime factor reservoirs into symmetric structural guarantees.
Neither $p-1$ nor $p+1$ dominates the other's largest prime factor: both $P^+(p+1) > P^+(p-1)$ and its reverse hold unconditionally for a positive proportion of primes.
We prove that each of the inequalities $P^{+}(p+1)>P^{+}(p-1)$ and $P^{+}(p-1)>P^{+}(p+1)$ holds for a positive proportion of primes. The argument combines a logarithmic balance identity with a uniform Selberg sieve over a thin cofactor strip. The same transfer mechanism applies to either shift and converts a one-sided large-prime-factor reservoir into an unconditional ordering result in both directions.