Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors develop a sensitivity-aware residual stream pruning framework that accounts for downstream layer impact using a second-order Taylor approximation of the model's output KL divergence. By deriving a tractable spectral upper bound, the method couples activation covariance with local output sensitivity, reducing the subspace selection problem to an efficient eigendecomposition of a sensitivity-weighted covariance matrix. Across multiple instruction-tuned LLM families, this output-aware selection consistently outperforms conventional activation-only reconstruction methods in calibration KL divergence, perplexity, and downstream task retention across compression ratios.
Shrinking an LLM's residual stream based on activation variance alone discards the wrong directions—weighting pruned subspaces by downstream output sensitivity dramatically improves compressed model performance without sacrificing closed-form computational efficiency.
Residual stream pruning methods reduce inference cost by shrinking the model's hidden dimension, but existing approaches typically choose these dimensions by minimizing activation reconstruction error. This criterion implicitly treats all perturbation directions as equally important, ignoring the sensitivity of downstream layers. We introduce a sensitivity-aware approach to residual-stream pruning that directly accounts for this direction-dependent sensitivity. Using a second-order approximation to the output KL divergence, we characterize the effect of a residual-stream perturbation through both its activation covariance and the local sensitivity of the model output. The resulting subspace selection objective couples these two quantities, but is difficult to optimize directly. We derive a tractable spectral upper bound that reduces subspace selection to an eigendecomposition of a sensitivity-weighted covariance matrix, retaining the efficiency and structural simplicity of rotation-based pruning methods. Across several instruction-tuned language model families, our method consistently reduces calibration KL divergence relative to activation-only pruning and improves perplexity and downstream task performance over a range of compression levels. Our results show that preserving activation energy alone is insufficient for residual-stream pruning, and that explicitly accounting for how perturbations propagate to the model output provides a more effective criterion for selecting dimensions to remove.