Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Investigating the theoretical limits of networked information aggregation on DAGs, this work establishes the minimal network depth and size required for localized linear agents to exactly match the global optimal linear predictor. The authors prove a sharp phase transition: single-parent message passing fails to achieve exact aggregation at any finite depth for $d \ge 3$ features, whereas permitting just two parents per agent guarantees exact aggregation with $O(d^2)$ total agents. Crucially, they show that exact aggregation is achievable at depth $O(d \log d)$ under distribution-oblivious designs and depth $O(d)$ under adaptive designs, with both depth and agent-count bounds proven optimal up to constant factors.
Just two incoming connections per agent completely break the finite-depth impossibility of single-parent aggregation, recovering the globally optimal predictor across arbitrary distributions in $O(d \log d)$ depth.
We study information aggregation in the networked learning model introduced by Kearns, Roth, and Ryu (SODA 2026). There is a fixed distribution over $d$ features and a common label. Agents learn in topological order on a directed acyclic graph. Each observes a subset of the features and its parents' predictions, fits a linear predictor to minimize mean squared error, and passes only its prediction forward. The global predictor is the best linear predictor using all features. Kearns, Roth, and Ryu show that the output agent's error approaches the global predictor's error along sufficiently deep paths with suitable feature coverage, while insufficient depth can prevent aggregation even in large networks. In contrast to their main focus on a given graph and feature allocation, we consider the limits of the model under two settings. In the adaptive designer setting, a designer chooses the graph, feature allocation, and output agent knowing the distribution. In the oblivious designer setting, the designer fixes all three before an adversary chooses the distribution. Each agent observes one feature and receives predictions from a limited number of parents. We call the aggregation exact when the output agent matches the global predictor exactly. For $d\ge3$, we show that no finite depth guarantees exact aggregation for every distribution with one parent per agent, even when the designer knows the distribution. In contrast, two parents per agent suffice for exact aggregation even in the oblivious designer setting. A fixed graph, feature allocation, and output agent achieve this for every distribution at depth $O(d\log d)$. Knowing the distribution reduces the depth to $O(d)$. Both constructions use $O(d^2)$ agents, with a very large constant for two parents. We show the bounds on the depth and number of agents are all optimal up to constant factors.