Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors evaluate asymmetric readout and gate errors across Google’s 2019 Sycamore quantum supremacy dataset ($12 \le n \le 53$) and validate their findings with simulated noisy circuits on IBM and Google platforms. While theoretical models predict that amplitude damping gate errors should induce a distinct zero-state bias in quantum circuit outputs, this signature is entirely absent from the empirical data. Instead, the observed zero-to-one ratios across the entire qubit spectrum reflect only the asymmetry of reported readout errors, challenging prevailing physical noise assumptions in NISQ benchmarks.
Standard quantum noise models predict that amplitude damping gate errors must systematically skew sample distributions toward zeros, yet Google's landmark 53-qubit supremacy data exhibits zero evidence of this effect.
This paper continues our analysis of NISQ experiments and especially the Google 2019 ``quantum supremacy" experiment. In arXiv:2008.05177 we proposed statistical tools to analyze symmetric and asymmetric readout errors, and the symmetric case was extensively developed and studied in arXiv:2404.00935, where we used Fourier methods combined with statistical tools. Here we extend and complement our earlier study and analyze asymmetric readout errors for data from experiments and simulations. Our study was further motivated by a paper by Fefferman et al. arXiv:2306.16659, who showed that the effect of amplitude damping gate errors is to have larger fractions of zeroes in the samples produced by the quantum computer. We show that this effect of gate errors is not observed in the Google experimental data, where, for the entire range of the number of qubits, $12 \le n \le 53$, the fraction of zeroes and ones reflects only the asymmetry of reported readout errors, and report on simulations with $n=12,14$ using IBM's and Google's simulators.