Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To prevent neural residual models from degrading physical baselines under covariate shift, this work stress-tests selective correction mechanisms against satellite evapotranspiration estimates across 16,366 flux-tower observations from 151 stations. Standard gain-based selectors catastrophically over-trust invalid inputs, endorsing corrections on physically impossible records that worsened mean absolute error by 21.6 mm/day over baseline OpenET, whereas an input-support-aware selector successfully throttles acceptance to suppress high-leverage errors. Although temporal comparisons did not survive Holm correction, domain-restricted crop-only training reliably improved performance by 0.041 mm/day MAE, demonstrating that selective neural post-processing requires strict support validation.
Neural residual corrections will confidently "fix" physically impossible satellite observations—spiking error by over 20 mm/day—unless models are explicitly engineered to detect out-of-support inputs and defer to the baseline.
Neural residuals can improve satellite evapotranspiration (ET) estimates, but selectors must predict when a correction helps and reject unsupported inputs. We evaluate ten-member models on 16,366 flux-tower observations from 151 stations paired with OpenET, across nine rolling years and five spatial folds. At one held-out station, Gain accepted corrections on all 32 physically invalid records: it predicted a mean benefit of 0.83 mm/day, but the corrections increased mean absolute error by 21.6 mm/day versus OpenET. On spatially held-out unit errors, SupportGain reduced station-macro MAE versus Gain by 0.148 mm/day under wind x3.6 (simultaneous 95% interval, 0.070 to 0.226), with 9.3% acceptance versus Gain's 51.8%; on clean inputs, its 0.006 mm/day advantage had an interval that includes zero. These fault analyses are exploratory; none of 40 preplanned temporal comparisons passed Holm correction, while a separate predeclared cropland contrast found 0.041 mm/day lower station-macro MAE with crop-only training (95% interval, 0.009 to 0.079).