Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors investigate whether constant-depth Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-time (IQP) circuits can serve as effective unsupervised feature extractors for tabular credit default prediction. Appending 16 expectation-value features from an 8-qubit circuit lifts Logistic Regression F1 from 0.462 to 0.517, statistically outperforming classical Kernel PCA at an identical feature budget ($p = 0.00007$). Crucially, this advantage disappears for non-linear baselines like XGBoost and Random Forests, indicating that IQP embeddings act primarily as linear-expressivity compensators rather than universally superior representations.
Quantum Hilbert space embeddings beat Kernel PCA by 5.5 F1 points on linear credit scoring, yet provide zero performance edge over standard classical tree ensembles.
Credit default prediction is a tabular classification problem in which modest gains in F1 translate directly into reduced financial exposure. We ask whether Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial-time (IQP) circuits can produce features that improve a classifier over both its raw classical baseline and Kernel PCA - the strongest unsupervised classical non-linear alternative - at an equal feature budget. The dataset provides 23 financial attributes per client; for an n-qubit circuit we select n of them, encode each as a rotation angle, and read 2n expectation values back out as new features. The motivation for using a quantum circuit is computational: an n-qubit IQP circuit runs in constant depth and encodes feature correlations in a 2^n-dimensional Hilbert space, whereas classical simulation of its exact output statistics scales exponentially in n. Using the UCI Default of Credit Card Clients dataset and five-fold cross-validation, we find that appending 16 IQP features (n = 8 qubits) to a Logistic Regression model raises F1 from 0.462 to 0.517 (+0.055, p < 0.0001). Kernel PCA, the next-best method, reaches only 0.493 at the same feature count; the gap survives Benjamini-Hochberg correction across 12 tests (p = 0.00007). No other classifier - Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, or k-NN - benefits, which points to a linear-expressivity mechanism rather than a generic improvement. We also show that how the 8 input features are chosen matters: Random Forest importance-guided selection reaches F1 = 0.523, while encoding maximally uncorrelated features drops it to 0.496, demonstrating that the circuit amplifies informative structure rather than creating it from scratch.