Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To overcome human heuristic bias in exploring the vast parameter space of Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), this work formulates the search for new physics operators explaining experimental anomalies as a reinforcement learning task. Automating this search is critical because complex loop-level operator correlations make exhaustive combinatorial exploration practically intractable for human phenomenologists. The trained RL agent successfully recovers and improves upon known operator solutions for the CDF $W$-mass anomaly while efficiently discovering valid operator bases in challenging, multi-anomaly regimes.
Combinatorial physics discovery spaces that previously required biased human heuristics can now be navigated autonomously, with RL agents outperforming manual intuition to find valid loop-level particle physics operators.
Finding new physics (NP) is the most important problem in particle physics today. Studying ``anomalies'', i.e., measurements of low-energy observables whose values disagree with the predictions of the Standard Model (SM), is a powerful search strategy. The SM Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) provides a general model-independent framework for parameterizing NP; it is natural to try to find the SMEFT operator(s) that can explain such anomalies. This is a challenging task because (i) the number of SMEFT operators is enormous, and (ii) at loop level there are very complicated correlations among the operators. Analyses by humans typically rely on phenomenological intuition to decide which operators are relevant. This is often biased and does not explore the complete SMEFT operator space. Interestingly, reinforcement learning (RL) techniques excel at tasks that require decision making to achieve their goals. In this paper, we introduce an RL method that can be used to find the SMEFT operators that explain any anomalies. We test it on the CDF $W$-mass anomaly, and show that it reproduces (and improves upon) known results. We then consider a far more complicated situation with multiple anomalies and show that, even here, this method is able to find the SMEFT operators that explain the data. Our RL method can therefore be used to efficiently search for NP at the level of SMEFT.