Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To resolve the tension between overwriting outdated information and answering historical questions, this work establishes RD-Forget, a training-free framework that decouples an agent's permanent storage archive from its inference-time memory view. By organizing facts into semantic slots with replacement links and applying a rate-distortion formulation under fixed token budgets, the system dynamically suppresses superseded values for current-state queries while resurrecting them for historical ones. Across knowledge updating, conversational memory, and multi-hop benchmarks, evaluating without this selective forgetting mechanism caused severe performance deficits, proving that dual-view retention is essential for non-stationary environments.
Deleting obsolete memories breaks historical recall, but keeping them poisons current reasoning—a trade-off solved by permanently storing raw history while dynamically masking superseded facts using query-conditioned semantic slots.
Persistent language agents need stored experience to remain available across time, while each answer requires evidence suited to a particular question. A superseded fact can mislead a current-state answer and still be essential for a historical query. We present RD-Forget, a training-free framework that separates what an agent stores from what it uses. A retained source archive preserves observations, and a query-conditioned memory view controls their influence on the current answer. A frozen language-model curator extracts relevant evidence, groups facts into semantic slots, and preserves the relations needed for multi-hop reasoning. Same-slot replacement links suppress superseded values in current-state contexts, while intent-aware retrieval makes earlier evidence eligible again. A rate-distortion formulation guides construction of the answer-time view within a memory budget. Experiments span conversational memory, knowledge updating, fact consolidation, long-context reasoning, and personalization under a shared answering pipeline. The results associate accurate answers with both query-relevant evidence construction and control over obsolete alternatives. Configurations without forgetting or query conditioning have the largest score deficits, while slot grouping, historical access, and relation preservation contribute complementary functions. Retaining history while selectively controlling its use offers a practical way to accommodate changing facts and future questions.