Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey systematically reviews 82 deep molecular generation architectures—spanning autoregressive models, VAEs, GANs, normalizing flows, and diffusion models—across both ligand-based and pocket-conditioned de novo design workflows. The synthesis unifies fragmented evaluation paradigms to highlight why pure in silico distribution learning often decouples from actual experimental bioactivity. Crucially, the analysis reveals that progress hinges less on novel generative backbones and more on incorporating receptor flexibility, rigorous 3D physical interactions, and multi-objective Pareto optimization into training.
Across 82 molecular generative models spanning diffusion to Transformers, high in silico benchmark scores still fail to reliably translate to wet-lab therapeutic hits without explicit modeling of receptor flexibility and 3D interaction physics.
Molecule generation has emerged as a powerful computational tool for de novo drug design, enabling the exploration of chemical space beyond the limits of conventional virtual screening. The field has progressed rapidly, driven by advances in molecular representations, generative architectures, and target-aware modeling strategies. However, existing reviews typically address specific model families or application scenarios in isolation, rather than offering an integrated perspective on how these components collectively form a coherent generation workflow. In this review, we present a comprehensive evaluation of molecule generation models for de novo drug design, covering 82 methods across five deep generative frameworks, including recurrent neural network (RNN)- and Transformer-based models, variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), flow-based models, and diffusion models. We first summarize widely used benchmarks and molecular representations, and then examine the methodological principles underlying both general and pocket-conditioned generation. A central contribution of this work is a systematic synthesis and comparative analysis of reported performance across commonly used benchmarks and evaluation metrics. We also summarize representative experimentally validated case studies. Looking ahead, we discuss future directions in standardized 3D data, interaction-aware generation, receptor flexibility, and multi-objective molecular design, with the aim of improving the reliability and experimental relevance of molecule generation. All collected benchmark resources, evaluation metrics, and model references are provided in a publicly accessible repository at https://github.com/JacklinGroup/molecule-generation-review.