Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors design a four-module decision framework that couples Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) prioritization with least-cost tooling tiering (Python bots, open-source orchestrators, and enterprise platforms) and stochastic financial modeling to optimize clinical workflow automation. Systematic pipeline governance addresses a critical operational gap, given that 30–50% of healthcare RPA deployments fail due to ad-hoc candidate selection and unmodeled integration risks. Validated across 2,000 Monte Carlo perturbation trials on a 20-process synthetic hospital portfolio, the framework preserved the top-five process rankings in 97.7% of runs and sustained positive net present value down to the 5th percentile.
Nearly half of hospital RPA deployments fail from ad-hoc scoping; pairing multi-criteria triage with least-cost tool tiering keeps automation portfolio NPV resilient down to the 5th percentile under heavy perturbation.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is widely used to reduce administrative burden in United States hospitals, yet an estimated 30-50% of RPA initiatives underperform because processes are selected informally, without a repeatable method to catalogue candidates, prioritize them, match each to an automation tier -- a Python bot, an open-source orchestrator such as n8n, or an enterprise platform such as UiPath -- and forecast financial return before committing resources. We propose a four-module, data-driven framework unifying these decisions: a Process Taxonomy of twenty recurring hospital processes across five value streams; a Prioritization module deriving an Automation Suitability Index from an Analytic Hierarchy Process matrix with an explicit consistency check; a Tool-Tier Selection module recommending the least-cost technology sufficient for a process complexity, integration, and compliance profile; and a Return-on-Investment module quantifying labor savings, error-cost avoidance, payback, and net present value. Applied to a synthetic portfolio spanning all twenty processes, plus a reference data-flow architecture linking it to hospital EHR/payer/ERP systems: 12 of 20 clear the prioritization threshold; the ranking is robust to +/-20% weight perturbation (Spearman correlation 0.83, top-5 set preserved 97.7%, 2,000 Monte Carlo trials); an Automation Risk Index flags four qualifying processes as Critical risk; a budget-constrained portfolio optimization shows diminishing marginal NPV as spend scales from $400K to $1.03M; and a second Monte Carlo analysis shows portfolio NPV stays positive at its 5th percentile. The framework is a conceptual synthesis of the literature rather than an instrument calibrated on primary hospital data; we discuss HIPAA governance and a research agenda for empirical validation. A supplementary Python implementation accompanies the paper.