Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This work replicates an evaluation framework using disjoint-set union algorithms to segment translation editing behavior into micro- and macro-units across varying temporal pause thresholds. Accurately quantifying these behavioral units is essential for modeling cognitive strain during human post-editing and interactive translation workflows. The findings confirm that dynamic, process-based units reflect cognitive effort far more reliably than static structural segmentations.
Standard text-based metrics miss the reality of cognitive effort: tracking pause-defined, process-based units reveals the true operational strain behind translation edits.
The paper describes a replication experiment to assess "the distribution of editing procedures across micro and macro units as an indicator of the strain of text production". We investigate various pause thresholds to isolate Micro and Macro units and conclude that process-based units might be more suitable entity.