Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To address the lack of ground-truth validation for LLM-generated industrial digital twins, this work evaluates automated evaluation metrics using a systematic perturbation framework applied across 6,400 Asset Administration Shell (AAS) instances generated by GPT-4o-mini, Qwen, and DeepSeek-R1. Reliable quality assurance is vital for Industry 4.0 adoption, where subtle hallucinations in structured asset models can break downstream physical-software interoperability. The authors find that pairing exact-match F1 scores on property names with soft similarity-based recall on property values provides the most sensitive, monotonic indicator of synthetic degradation across diverse model families.
Ground-truth-free validation of industrial digital twins requires a hybrid metric split: exact matching for schema property names, but soft semantic recall for property values.
The rapid digital transformation of manufacturing, often referred to as Industry 4.0, relies on seamless interoperability between physical and software assets. A central enabler is the Asset Administration Shell (AAS), a standardized digital representation of such assets. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable the generation of AAS submodels from unstructured sources such as product datasheets but raise challenges for quality assurance. In particular, unexpected errors, the lack of ground truth references, and the absence of standardized quality metrics hinder reliable adoption. In this work, we evaluate quality metrics for AI-generated AAS using a perturbation-based evaluation framework. By systematically degrading AAS generation along multiple dimensions, we assess how well different metrics reflect quality changes. Based on a dataset of 200 products from multiple manufacturers, we generate 6,400 AAS instances using GPT-4o-mini, Qwen3, and DeepSeek-R1. Our results show that metrics based on exact matching of property names and similarity-based soft matching of property values, in particular value-based recall and name-based F1 score, provide the most reliable indicators of quality degradation. Furthermore, we quantify the impact of different perturbation types and analyze differences across model families and product segments. These findings support the selection of suitable metrics, the tuning of LLM-based pipelines, and the integration of AI-generated AAS into industrial applications.