Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Resolution-Aware Experimental Design (RAED), a novel approach that addresses the challenges of partial identifiability in experimental design by selecting experiments based on the smallest expected nonempty structural candidate set while controlling for false exclusions. The authors demonstrate that traditional metrics of information gain can lead to misleading conclusions about structural resolution, revealing significant discrepancies in experiment selection under constrained sensing conditions. RAED's implementation shows promising results in two subsurface-flow benchmarks, highlighting its ability to improve experimental outcomes by managing nuisance uncertainty effectively.
Traditional metrics can mislead experiment selection, but RAED reveals that the smallest expected structural candidate set can yield better insights under uncertainty.
Experimental design is commonly framed as choosing the experiment expected to provide the most information. Under partial identifiability however, persistent nuisance uncertainty can make the same observation carry different structural meanings. We introduce Resolution-Aware Experimental Design (RAED), which selects an experiment by the smallest expected nonempty structural candidate set achievable subject to false-exclusion control. We prove an exact cross-nuisance aliasing separation: an experiment can be preferred by structural and full-latent information gain, average classification, and nuisance-marginalized informativeness while having arbitrarily poorer valid structural resolution. RAED nevertheless preserves the expected ordering under a genuine composite Blackwell comparison. To make this criterion operational, we develop a learned score-based implementation with finite-sample nuisance-average and positive-tail calibration, and characterize a rare-tail sample-complexity obstruction. Under constrained sensing, two subsurface-flow benchmarks exhibit genuine RAED--expected-information-gain (EIG) experiment-selection disagreements, with the clearest and largest held-out resolution differences in WCA. In a fluvial benchmark, tail protection changes the selected physical experiment and replaces hard-region false exclusions primarily with explicit ambiguity. In a mechanistic methane-oxidation benchmark, a prospectively specified 5\% false-exclusion tolerance also yields a nontrivial finite-sample population guarantee for tail-sensitive nuisance risk, with 95\% joint confidence across all three structural families.