Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the edge-girth as a novel structural edge feature for graph neural networks (GNNs), addressing the limitations of traditional subgraph counting methods that require prior knowledge of substructure sizes. By integrating edge-girth into a gated message-passing architecture (EGAGNN), the authors achieve a mean absolute error (MAE) on the ZINC-12k regression benchmark that is three times lower than the closest comparator with a similar parameter count. However, the study also reveals a fundamental limitation where the edge-girth descriptor fails to distinguish certain graph pairs, reverting to the 1-WL bound, highlighting the challenges in enhancing GNN expressiveness without prior structural assumptions.
Edge-girth outperforms traditional structural descriptors in GNNs, achieving a significant reduction in error while exposing inherent limitations in graph discrimination.
Graph neural networks (GNN) based on message passing are provably no more powerful than the one-dimensional Weisfeiler--Leman colour-refinement test (1-WL): two graphs it cannot tell apart receive identical representations, however deep or wide the network. A common remedy augments node or edge features with precomputed structural descriptors, most often counts of a fixed small subgraph such as triangles or longer cycles, but such counts require committing in advance to the size of the substructure counted, a choice usually made blind to the data. We study a descriptor that avoids this choice. The edge-girth of an edge is the length of a shortest cycle through it, and its multiplicity is the number of such shortest cycles; together they form a per-edge invariant that reports cycles of arbitrary length, computable exactly by a single breadth-first search per edge. Injected into a gated message-passing architecture, EGAGNN, it reaches a test MAE a factor three below the closest gated comparator on the ZINC-12k regression benchmark at 104k parameters; against bounded cycle-counting descriptors under the same architecture, it matches only a dictionary counting cycles up to length eight, using twice as many channels, while a dictionary capped at length four performs no better than no structural information at all. On graph discrimination we prove a matching limitation: on graphs where every edge sees the same number of shortest cycles of the same length, the descriptor becomes constant and any model built on it collapses back to the 1-WL bound. This holds without exception across all 400 pairs of the BREC benchmark: not one of the 90 such pairs is distinguished.