Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the use of sparse autoencoders (SAEs) for adjusting text-based causal confounding, addressing the inherent tradeoff between representation size and variance in effect estimation. By employing conditional independence tests to iteratively select a minimal set of SAE features, the authors demonstrate that their approach yields lower bias and higher coverage compared to traditional methods in both standard and semi-synthetic evaluations. The findings highlight the interpretability of SAE representations, which can facilitate falsification in causal analysis, especially in complex multi-label scenarios.
Sparse autoencoders not only reduce bias in causal effect estimation but also enhance interpretability, paving the way for more robust analyses in text-based research.
In many settings, studying causal questions based on text data requires adjusting for confounding information within texts. Yet there is a tradeoff in constructing text representations for adjustment: they must be sufficiently large and/or dense to preserve the confounding variables necessary for unbiased effect estimation, but sufficiently small and/or sparse to satisfy finite-sample overlap and yield low-variance estimates. To address this tradeoff, we turn to sparse autoencoders (SAEs), and propose a novel causal adjustment pipeline that iteratively selects a minimal set of SAE features via conditional independence tests. We find that SAE representations achieve better adjustments (lower bias and and higher coverage) than alternative representations in standard semi-synthetic evaluations with binary confounders, and their interpretability offers opportunities for falsification. We also introduce a more realistic semi-synthetic evaluation that uses multi-label data as the unobserved confounders and find off-the-shelf adjustment methods require increased investigation for these more complex settings. Code: https://github.com/mianzg/sae-text-confounder