Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PredErase, a training-free method for object and effect removal that leverages predictive latent guidance to enhance the editing capabilities of frozen models like FLUX.2 and I-JEPA. By expanding the editable mask to include local residuals and utilizing context-conditioned targets, PredErase effectively separates the pixel rewriting process from the structural context needed to fill the removed area. The results show that while supervised methods still outperform on full-image metrics, PredErase significantly improves the editing quality on instance-only masks across multiple benchmarks.
Training-free object removal can now intelligently account for photometric footprints, improving visual coherence without the need for extensive retraining.
Removing an object is not the same as filling its mask. Cast shadows and contact shading usually lie outside the user-provided instance mask M_obj, so a frozen Fill model that edits only that mask leaves the object's photometric footprint on nearby surfaces. Supervised removers learn this joint erasure from paired clean plates. Training-free editors freeze pretrained weights, yet most still treat M_obj as the entire editable support and steer sampling with CLIP or DINO energies that do not predict the occluded scene. We present PredErase, a training-free inference procedure on frozen FLUX.2 and I-JEPA. The method separates where Fill may rewrite pixels from what structure should occupy the hole. A contact-band expansion M_flux of M_obj exposes local residuals on the supporting plane. I-JEPA, pretrained for masked token prediction, supplies a context-conditioned hole target in representation space; sparse projected gradients align decoded Fill completions with that target inside the instance, while coordinates outside the packed support stay locked. Under instance-only masks on RemovalBench, RORD-Val, and DEFACTO-Val, PredErase improves the native FLUX.2 backbone. Supervised removers remain stronger on several full-image appearance metrics; the supported claim is training-free object-and-effect editing of frozen Fill, not replacement of paired-data erasers.