Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the covert injection of targeted social biases into aligned large language models (LLMs) using seemingly benign synthetic data. By employing a pipeline where a misaligned teacher model generates filtered datasets for fine-tuning aligned student models, the authors demonstrate that such data can transmit biases while maintaining the models' general task performance. The findings underscore a significant security risk in synthetic data usage, prompting a call for enhanced safeguards in LLM training processes.
Benign synthetic data can covertly inject targeted biases into LLMs, posing a hidden threat to model alignment and safety.
Synthetic data is increasingly used to train large language models (LLMs), yet its security implications remain poorly understood. Prior work on subliminal learning suggests that models can inherit behavioral traits from seemingly unrelated training data. In this work, we investigate whether such mechanisms can be exploited to inject targeted social biases into aligned models through semantically benign synthetic data. We construct a pipeline in which a misaligned teacher model generates filtered synthetic datasets across domains such as creative writing and code generation, which are then used to fine-tune aligned student models. Our experiments show that benign-looking synthetic data can act as a covert channel for transmitting targeted biases while largely preserving the student model's general task capabilities. These results reveal a previously underexplored security risk in synthetic data-driven LLM training pipelines and highlight the need for improved safeguards. As one possible step toward this goal, we suggest that log-linearity-based scoring may provide a useful signal for screening seemingly benign synthetic data.