Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces TaxCE, an automated framework designed to construct multi-level hierarchical taxonomies from unstructured feedback text, addressing the limitations of existing methods that yield shallow hierarchies or overlook long-tail topics. By employing a progressive condensation approach, TaxCE organizes content into actionable segments and deduplicated semantic units, culminating in a corpus-grounded hierarchical structure. Extensive evaluations show that TaxCE outperforms traditional and modern taxonomy construction methods, achieving significant improvements in exclusivity, exhaustivity, and granularity, validated by human assessments of taxonomy quality.
TaxCE achieves an average improvement of over 15 percentage points in taxonomy quality metrics compared to existing methods, revolutionizing how we organize unstructured feedback at scale.
Organizing unstructured feedback text into hierarchical taxonomy is a fundamental challenge in NLP, particularly in domains where feedback arrives at massive scale in varied forms such as reviews, transcripts, and surveys. Existing approaches either produce shallow hierarchies, neglect long-tail topics, or lack rigorous evaluation frameworks. We present TaxCE, a fully automated framework that constructs multi-level hierarchical taxonomies from raw text through progressive condensation of corpus content into actionable segments, deduplicated semantic units, and granular topics with definitions, which are then organized bottom-up into a hierarchy with corpus-groundedness. We also introduce three corpus-grounded evaluation metrics, Exclusivity, Exhaustivity, and Granularity (EEG), and integrate them into a metrics-in-the-loop iterative refinement mechanism that diagnoses deficiencies and applies targeted corrections until convergence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TaxCE consistently outperforms existing baselines spanning classical topic models, neural methods, and LLM-based approaches, with average improvements of 11.8, 20.5, and 15.7 percentage points in exclusivity, exhaustivity, and granularity respectively over the strongest baseline. Human evaluation further confirms superior taxonomy quality, actionability, and navigability.