Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the mechanisms of multilingual multimodal misinformation by first compiling a large-scale dataset of misinformation instances from Twitter/X across seven languages. It introduces a comprehensive taxonomy grounded in qualitative analysis and operationalizes it through an automated annotation pipeline using a Vision-Language Model (VLM), validated by human assessment. Key findings reveal specific strategies employed in misinformation dissemination, such as the prevalence of AI-generated content in tech-related misinformation and the strategic use of news images in vaccination-related falsehoods, highlighting the need for tailored detection approaches.
Social media users exploit multimodal strategies in misinformation, with AI-generated content dominating tech narratives and news images lending credibility to vaccine falsehoods.
Multimodal misinformation on social media is highly prevalent, potent, and harmful, yet difficult to detect and counter, and still poorly understood compared to its text-only counterpart. Research on the properties and deceptive strategies of multimodal misinformation is hindered by a lack of taxonomies grounded in real-world contexts and by the limitations of current multimodal machine learning models, which prevent the automation of annotation and analysis at scale. We address these shortcomings in three steps. First, we collect a large-scale, high-quality dataset of real-world misinformation instances from Twitter/X in seven languages. Second, we develop a novel, comprehensive taxonomy of multimodal misinformation grounded in an in-depth qualitative analysis of the data and prior theoretical work. Finally, we operationalise the taxonomy through an automated multi-step annotation pipeline using a Vision-Language Model (VLM), and perform human-validation. Our novel approach leads to previously undocumented insights about how social media users combine images with text to spread misinformation in the wild, e.g., that AI-generated content is particularly prevalent in technology and science, while vaccination misinformation disproportionately utilises images from news outlets to assert credibility. Our method and findings provide guidance for targeted approaches for detecting multimodal misinformation, and suggest that mitigation efforts should be developed and applied strategically rather than uniformly.