Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how AI professionals interpret and navigate the complexities of artificial intelligence through a mixed-methods approach, combining computational text analysis of millions of AI-related articles and social media posts with insights from 57 semi-structured interviews. It identifies key sociological frames that shape collective cognition regarding AI's societal impacts, focusing on three primary debates: the method of AI development, the nature of AI as a mind, and the morality surrounding its use. The findings reveal that these frames significantly influence how responsibility is assigned and how AI development is perceived, highlighting the need for awareness of these dynamics as AI technology evolves.
AI professionals grapple with competing frames that shape their understanding of responsibility, development methods, and the moral implications of AI, revealing deep societal divides in the discourse.
How can humans make sense of the rapid takeoff of artificial intelligence (AI)? We studied the sensemaking dynamics of AI through an open-ended, mixed-methods study with computational text analysis of millions of AI-related newspaper articles and social media posts grounded in 57 semi-structured interviews with AI professionals in 2021 and 2023--before and after the recent surge of public interest. We identify a range of sociological frames (interpretive schemas that structure collective cognition) and show how AI professionals use frames to address significant cognitive challenges, such as assigning responsibility for societal impacts. We develop a framework of three primary debates across which frames are adopted and contested: (i) the $\textit{method}$ of AI development, between frames of top-down expert systems and bottom-up emergent capabilities, (ii) the $\textit{mind}$ of an AI system, ranging from a passive tool to a humanlike"digital mind,"and (iii) the $\textit{morality}$ of how AI is used, particularly the decision of whether to slow down or speed up AI development. As humanity enters the era of transformative AI, technologists and policymakers must account for the framing dynamics that will circumscribe our beliefs, values, and actions.