Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SWE Refactor Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate coding agents on their ability to autonomously perform long-horizon, whole-repository stack migrations while addressing the issue of "Blindness" in existing benchmarks. The evaluation protocol consists of three stages: Migration Audit, Behavioural Tests, and Agentic Verification, which assess both the completeness of the migration and the correctness of the resulting code. Results from 520 runs across multiple models reveal that only 5.4% of attempts successfully pass all evaluation stages, highlighting significant challenges in achieving reliable migrations and the varying capabilities of agents across different migration tasks.
Only 5.4% of coding agent attempts successfully complete a migration while preserving behavioral correctness, exposing a critical gap in current AI capabilities for software evolution.
Modern software systems accumulate technical debt over decades of development, which makes migration expensive and largely manual. As coding agents become increasingly capable at bug fixing, can they autonomously perform such migrations? Existing benchmarks cannot answer this question because they evaluate only behavioural correctness, not whether the migration actually occurred. This leads an easy hack: agents copy the original implementation to make tests pass. We call this Blindness. To address this problem, we introduce SWE Refactor Bench, a benchmark comprising 20 whole-repository migrations, covering 4 kinds of technical debt. A three-stage evaluation protocol measures both migration completeness and behavioural correctness. (1) Migration Audit verifies that the migration occurred. (2) Behavioural Tests measure correctness with a fixed test suite. (3) Agentic Verification uses 6 independent coding agents to generate targeted tests for hidden behavioural differences. Across 520 runs from 8 frontier models and 26 model-effort configurations, only 28 of 520 runs ($5.4\%$) pass all three stages, 13 of the 20 tasks receive no accepted solution, and the best model (claude-opus-5) scores $47.0/100$. Migration completeness and behavioural correctness are distinct abilities: a few runs preserve behaviour by skipping the migration and are stopped at Migration Audit; most attempt it and break behaviour, and are stopped at Behavioural Tests. Agents cannot deliver a perfect migration: among the 340 runs that pass Migration Audit, $58\%$ reach $99\%$ of the fixed checks, yet only $26\%$ reach $100\%$. Agent capability differs across migration categories: agents score $31.4$ on build toolchain rewrites but only $5.6$ on language rewrites. Together, these findings position SWE Refactor Bench as a rigorous testbed for developing coding agents for reliable whole-repository migrations.
Tsinghua AI