Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a reward-free continual learning framework for space robots that enables them to adapt to hardware degradation in extreme environments without relying on traditional reward signals. By leveraging latent-state world models, the method allows for the pre-training of a model-based agent that predicts reward structures, which is then used to update the transition dynamics during deployment. The approach is validated through simulated tasks, showing that the agent can effectively adapt to altered dynamics despite significant morphological failures.
Space robots can now adapt to hardware failures in real-time without needing reward signals, revolutionizing their operational resilience in extreme environments.
Space robots operate in extreme environments where hardware degradation can critically compromise traditional control strategies. While continual reinforcement learning offers a promising mechanism for online adaptation, it inherently requires access to a reward signal during deployment. However, precise reward computation in space is often infeasible due to the lack of external tracking systems and the overall complexity of the environment. To address the challenge of unobservable rewards, we introduce a reward-free continual learning framework that leverages latent-state world models. By pre-training a model-based agent across diverse simulations, the world model learns a robust predictor of the reward structure within its latent space. Upon deployment to an environment with severe hardware degradation, we freeze the observation encoder and reward predictor to update only the transition dynamics of the world model through unsupervised rollouts. By training the policy entirely on imagined trajectories generated by this updated world model, the agent adapts to altered dynamics without receiving new rewards. We demonstrate our approach across simulated planetary traversal, orbital navigation, and precision assembly tasks subjected to severe morphological failures.