Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a novel neural-aided initialization pipeline for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) that replaces traditional model-based algorithms with two complementary neural networks: ResAlignNet for alignment and DCNet for calibration. By operating in situ on a single nearly constant-velocity trajectory and utilizing the same inputs as conventional methods, the proposed approach significantly streamlines the initialization process, making it less dependent on complex maneuvers and sensor quality. The results show a remarkable average reduction of 68.7% in velocity root mean squared error compared to the model-based baseline, demonstrating both efficiency and accuracy improvements in AUV navigation.
A neural-aided approach slashes AUV initialization time and error by over 68% while simplifying the process to a single trajectory.
Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) rely on the fusion of inertial navigation systems (INS) and Doppler velocity logs (DVL) for accurate navigation. Before deployment, this fusion requires a DVL initialization pipeline consisting of two stages: alignment, which estimates the rotation between the INS and DVL frames, and calibration, which estimates the DVL error terms. Conventionally, both stages are solved with model-based algorithms that demand complex vehicle maneuvers, surface-level satellite reference measurements, and simplified error models, making initialization time-consuming, trajectory-dependent, and sensitive to sensor quality. In this work, we propose a fully neural- aided DVL initialization pipeline that replaces both stages with two complementary neural networks: ResAlignNet for alignment and DCNet for calibration. The unified pipeline operates in situ on a single nearly constant-velocity trajectory and uses the same inputs as the model-based baseline. Using real-world data recorded across five distinct sensor error-term combinations, the proposed pipeline reduces the velocity root mean squared error by an average of 68.7% over the model-based baseline, using only 25s of data for initialization.