Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
AutoResearch is a two-stage autonomous research system that integrates Idea Generation and Idea Execution to ensure scientific rigor in research workflows. By continuously synthesizing emerging research signals with domain knowledge, it generates grounded and testable research plans, which are then executed through coordinated agents that implement and review experiments. The system not only enhances the reliability of experimental results but also significantly improves performance metrics, as evidenced by a notable increase in mean Recall on the RSICD benchmark compared to other systems.
AutoResearch achieves a 1.85-point improvement in mean Recall while reducing audit-confirmed issues, showcasing a new standard for reliability in autonomous research systems.
Autonomous research systems are increasingly capable of executing long research workflows, yet automation alone does not ensure that the resulting process remains scientifically grounded. We introduce AutoResearch, a two-stage system that connects Idea Generation with Idea Execution to address both how research ideas are formed and how they are reliably established through experimentation. In Idea Generation, AutoResearch continuously integrates emerging research signals with accumulated domain knowledge, identifies transferable mechanistic insights, and uses multi-model generation and cross-review to produce grounded, testable research plans. In Idea Execution, coordinated agents decompose these plans into experiments, iteratively implement and diagnose them, and employ independent evidence-based review before accepting research conclusions. Across representative settings in cross-modal retrieval, systems optimization, and benchmark-driven machine learning, AutoResearch turns generated ideas into measurable progress, detects and corrects unreliable experimental results, and makes evidence-conditioned decisions to continue, revise, or terminate research directions. For example, on RSICD benchmark, an AutoResearch-generated idea improves mean Recall from 32.84 to 34.69, while recording only 5 audit-confirmed issue events compared with 11-27 for other autonomous research systems. These results demonstrate a research process in which meaningful insight is grounded before experimentation and conclusions are grounded before acceptance: Insight In, Hallucination Out.