Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study develops a comprehensive statistical framework to evaluate the prospective impacts of electoral reforms on representation, integrating descriptive statistics, probabilistic race and ethnicity imputation, ecological inference, and redistricting simulations. By applying this framework to proposed reforms for the Los Angeles City Council, the authors reveal that simply expanding the Council does not significantly enhance representation for marginalized communities, while reforms like eliminating low-turnout primaries and adopting multimember districts show substantial potential for improving representational equity. These findings highlight the importance of careful assessment in electoral reform processes to avoid unintended consequences and ensure diverse voices are heard in governance.
Expanding the City Council won't fix representation; eliminating low-turnout primaries and adopting multimember districts could be game-changers for equity in Los Angeles.
Electoral reforms -- including changes to district boundaries, electoral rules, and the size of elected bodies -- are a recurrent feature of American state and municipal politics. The representational impact of such reforms is challenging to assess before they are implemented, and even well-intentioned civic reformers are often surprised by the unintended consequences of changes to the political system. We develop a statistical framework for the prospective evaluation of electoral reforms by integrating several modes of analysis: descriptive statistics of the voter file, probabilistic race and ethnicity imputation, ecological inference, and redistricting simulations via ensembles. Together, these tools provide a unified assessment of how proposed reforms affect whose voices are ultimately heard in government. We apply this framework to reforms currently being considered for the Los Angeles City Council, including increasing the number of single-member districts, adopting ranked-choice voting, and introducing multimember districts elected by proportional ranked choice voting. We find that expanding the Council alone is unlikely to substantially improve representation for underrepresented communities. In contrast, eliminating low-turnout primary elections and adopting multimember districts produce larger improvements in representational equity. Our analyses were shared with L.A.'s Charter Reform Commission via public testimony in late 2025. Although motivated by Los Angeles, the framework is broadly applicable to evaluating prospective electoral reforms across American jurisdictions.