Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study critically re-evaluates eight training-free quality-enhancement techniques rooted in Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) for latent diffusion models, focusing on their performance across compositional alignment benchmarks rather than solely on image quality. The findings reveal that none of the methods consistently outperform CFG, with APG achieving nominal best scores that often fall within evaluation uncertainty. Additionally, attention-perturbation methods yield mixed results, showing isolated improvements in some cases but frequent degradations in others, reinforcing CFG as a reliable baseline approach.
CFG remains the most reliable baseline for enhancing latent diffusion models, with no new methods consistently outperforming it.
Inference-time quality-enhancement methods are an effective and widely adopted means of improving diffusion models without expensive retraining. We study a family of training-free techniques conceptually rooted in Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG), most of which were originally proposed on older U-Net diffusion models and validated using metrics that assess image quality in isolation, without accounting for compositional alignment or semantic correspondence between the generated image and its associated text prompt. We re-evaluate eight such methods on two open-weight rectified-flow transformers under a fixed per-model protocol and three compositional-alignment benchmarks. No method consistently improves on CFG across the measured criteria. APG obtains several nominal best scores, but the corresponding gains often remain within the estimated evaluation uncertainty. Attention-perturbation methods provide isolated gains on SD3.5 Medium and more frequent degradations on FLUX.2 [klein] 4B Base, while CFG remains a competitive lower-cost baseline.