Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the impact of transforming hyperspectral reflectance spectra into 2D image representations to enhance the retrieval of plant functional traits using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). By comparing nine transformations on the GreenHyperSpectra dataset, the authors found that the simplest method—a direct Reshape of the spectrum into a 2D grid—outperformed state-of-the-art 1D CNNs, achieving an $R^2$ of 0.684 compared to 0.587 for the 1D baseline. Additionally, a pretrained 2D masked autoencoder demonstrated superior performance in linear probing, indicating that the representational advantages of 2D images, rather than model complexity, drive improvements in multi-trait predictions.
Transforming hyperspectral spectra into 2D images boosts multi-trait prediction accuracy by nearly 10% over traditional 1D methods.
Hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy enables non-destructive estimation of plant functional traits, yet current deep learning approaches process spectra as one-dimensional sequences, which limits how they capture long-range inter-band dependencies. We asked whether transforming 1D spectra into 2D image representations improves multi-trait prediction with convolutional neural networks (CNN). We compared nine transformations using EfficientNet-B0 on the GreenHyperSpectra dataset (7,897 labeled spectra, eight traits, 400-2450 nm), benchmarked against published 1D CNN results on the same split. Trained from scratch, the simplest transformation, a direct Reshape of the spectrum into a 2D grid, performed best ($R^2 = 0.684 \pm 0.001$) and improved on the state-of-the-art 1D baseline ($R^2 = 0.587$, $+0.097$). We then pretrained a 2D masked autoencoder (MAE-2D) on 139,000 unlabeled spectral images. Linear probing, which freezes the encoder and trains only a multilayer perceptron head, reached $R^2 = 0.646$ and exceeded every 1D self-supervised counterpart, including the fine-tuned MAE-1D ($R^2 = 0.641$). Under cross-dataset evaluation all models lost most of their accuracy and none beat the 1D baseline significantly. To identify which wavelengths drive each prediction, we applied Integrated Gradients and Grad-CAM and unfolded band importance back to the spectral axis. Protein ($r = 0.45$) and leaf water ($r = 0.33$) agreed with sensitivities simulated by the PROSAIL radiative-transfer model, while carotenoids ($r = 0.06$) and leaf area index ($r = -0.11$) did not, showing that the model reads established leaf chemistry for traits with sharp absorption features. The representational advantage of 2D spectral images, rather than architectural complexity or ImageNet pretraining, drives the gain over 1D approaches.