Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a Volume-Conditioned Adaptive Post-Processing (VCAP) scheme that enhances instance-level detection in stroke lesion segmentation by adjusting component-size thresholds based on predicted lesion burden. The findings reveal that this post-processing technique significantly outperforms traditional architectural changes, yielding a 0.032 improvement in Lesion-F1, which is six times greater than any architectural modification tested. Additionally, the use of a resolution-aware attention architecture (Viola2Plus) demonstrates that while voxel-overlap metrics may remain unchanged, the detection rate for small lesions can increase by 3.7%, underscoring the importance of focusing on instance-level accuracy.
Closing the gap between voxel overlap and instance-level detection can boost small lesion detection rates by over 3%, a critical insight for improving medical imaging accuracy.
Instance-level lesion detection has been an increasingly larger focal point in medical image segmentation besides the more standard voxel-level overlap. Still, most pipelines are trained and post-processed for voxel overlap alone. In particular, the mismatch is most pronounced for small lesions, where a near-miss prediction---substantial overlap that falls just short of the instance-matching threshold---scores the same as a complete miss. In our ISLES'26 submission, we found that closing this gap mattered far more in post-processing than in architecture design. Our Volume-Conditioned Adaptive Post-Processing (VCAP) scheme adjusts component-size thresholds to each case's predicted lesion burden, improving Lesion-F1 by 0.032 (unbiased cross-fold estimate)---approximately 6 times larger than any architectural change we tested. A resolution-aware attention architecture (Viola2Plus), designed for small-lesion segmentation, shows why the distinction matters: it left small-lesion Dice unchanged but raised small-lesion detection rate by 3.7\%, a real effect voxel-overlap metrics alone would have missed. Under 5-fold cross-validation on the 1,453-case training set, our post-processed two-architecture ensemble achieves Dice 0.651 and Lesion-F1 0.614, versus 0.644 and 0.573 for the unprocessed single-model baseline.