Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a question-driven framework that leverages large language models to automate the identification of relevant cohorts from scientific literature, addressing the limitations of manual searches and existing cohort catalogues. By generating tailored PubMed queries and extracting cohort names from retrieved literature, the framework successfully identified 188 candidate cohorts related to youth aggression genetics, with 44 meeting predefined eligibility criteria after manual screening. Notably, 17 of these eligible cohorts were not found in any established cohort catalogues, highlighting the framework's potential to uncover overlooked research opportunities.
Automated literature searches can reveal hidden cohorts that traditional catalogues miss, expanding research possibilities in genetics and beyond.
Background: Planning multi-study analyses requires identifying cohorts with the relevant participants, phenotypes, and data modalities. This process commonly relies on prior knowledge, cohort catalogues, and manual literature searches. We developed a complementary question-driven framework that searches relevant scientific literature and extracts explicit cohort names. Methods: The framework first generates multiple PubMed queries from configurable vocabularies and templates and retrieves the resulting scientific literature automatically through the PubMed API. A large language model then screens the retrieved titles and abstracts and extracts explicit cohort names using a prompt tailored to the research question. The extracted names are deduplicated with human review. Configurable code, prompts, and example outputs are available at https://gitlab.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/cap_molgenlab/literature-cohort-discovery. Evaluation: As a use case, we applied the framework to youth aggression genetics. From 5,400 generated PubMed queries, the framework retrieved 5,254 unique records and identified 188 candidate cohorts. Manual screening using predefined criteria, including participant age and genetic-data availability, retained 44 eligible cohorts. Automated LLM-based name extraction was within the agreement range of human annotators. We also searched four established cohort catalogues using the same research question. Their combined results contained 27 of the 44 eligible cohorts, while 17 were not returned by any cohort catalogue search. Conclusion: The framework converts research-question-specific vocabulary into screenable cohort inventories via a large, automated literature search. It can be adapted across populations, phenotypes, data modalities, and study designs, and provides a literature-based complement to curated cohort catalogues.