Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces BERTopic-VP, a novel topic-modelling framework that integrates contextual embedding-based clustering with a Virality Prioritisation layer to effectively analyze health misinformation on Twitter during pandemics. By employing a two-stage hybrid misinformation detection module, the framework achieves high classification performance (F1 up to 0.950, ROC-AUC up to 0.989) while identifying impactful misinformation clusters based on virality thresholds. The approach not only enhances the semantic coherence of identified topics but also enables the prioritization of narratives that may pose significant public health risks, even in the absence of direct engagement metrics.
Virality-prioritised topic modelling reveals high-risk misinformation narratives that traditional methods overlook, enabling timely public health interventions.
Health misinformation circulating during pandemics can gain traction rapidly, creating harmful narratives that compete with public health guidance. Most topic-modelling pipelines treat engagement as an external outcome, limiting their ability to prioritise semantically coherent topics that are also rapidly diffusing. We introduce BERTopic-VP, a virality-prioritised topic-modelling framework that combines contextual embedding-based clustering (BERTopic) with a post hoc Virality Prioritisation (VP) layer. The pipeline is complemented by a two-stage hybrid misinformation detection module that fuses a supervised content-based classifier with an external verification signal derived from public-health knowledge bases. Applied to three benchmark datasets, COVID-19_FNIR, Monkeypox, and Constraint, the framework achieves strong classification performance, with F1 up to 0.950 and ROC-AUC up to 0.989, while identifying high-impact clusters under top 1%, 5%, and 10% VP thresholds. For datasets without native engagement metadata, prioritisation is based on a logistic propensity-to-spread score, used as an ordinal proxy for diffusion potential rather than a direct measure of engagement. The results show that integrating semantic structure, virality-aware ranking, and affective-linguistic profiling enables scalable and interpretable comparative analysis of misinformation across pandemics. The proposed framework supports monitoring-oriented early warning by surfacing low-volume but high-risk narratives for analyst review.