Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates Wiktionary as a crowdsourced lexicon for 12 national varieties of English, revealing its extensive coverage compared to traditional dictionaries like the Oxford English Dictionary (OED). By analyzing dialect-specific case studies, particularly New Zealand English, the authors found a strong correlation in word-formation patterns between Wiktionary and the OED (R = 0.883). Additionally, the research highlights the challenges in assessing dialect-responsive language resources, particularly regarding language contact and register effects in online corpora.
Wiktionary not only rivals traditional dictionaries in dialect coverage but also reveals critical challenges in evaluating language resources for diverse English varieties.
This paper evaluates Wiktionary as an ethically crowdsourced lexicon for English dialects. We took a two-phase approach, providing an in-depth descriptive analysis of the crowdsourced lexicon for 12 national varieties of English before applying the lexicon to geo-referenced, country-level social media language data to examine the real-world performance of this crowdsourced dialect lexicon. We demonstrate that Wiktionary matches or exceeds the coverage of traditional dictionaries, such as the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), for regional and Outer-Circle varieties. Our dialect-specific case study on New Zealand English found high alignment between Wiktionary and the OED based on word-formation patterns (R = 0.883). Similarly, we observed high alignment between the dialect lexicon and geo-referenced social media language. While this paper found that Wiktionary has broad coverage of lexical properties, it also highlighted some of the macro-challenges involved in evaluating dialect-responsive language resources and tools, such as the role of language contact in dialects and register effects in web-based corpora.