Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the blockchain censorship attack by demonstrating that imposing a detectability threshold can deter whales—validators with significant voting power—from participating, thereby altering the equilibrium of the attack. The authors show that when whales opt out, minnows alone lack the capacity to successfully execute the attack, leading to a reduction in potential rewards for the whales. Monte Carlo simulations further validate these findings within the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems, highlighting the nuanced dynamics of validator incentives in blockchain governance.
Imposing a detectability threshold can flip the incentives for whales, making them less likely to join censorship attacks and destabilizing the attack's viability.
We study the blockchain censorship attack introduced in [21], which shows that joining the attack is a dominant strategy. We show that, by introducing certain detectability threshold, joining the attack can lead to strictly less reward for whales, which are defined to be a small number of validators that hold significantly more voting power than the rest (henceforth known as minnows). This leads to a change of the equilibrium: With whales unwilling to participate in the attack, it is difficult for minnows alone to launch the attack. We also perform Monte Carlo simulation to show the existence of reduction for whales' reward in Ethereum and Solana.