Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces an open-source benchmarking platform designed to evaluate various DNA data storage codecs, addressing the fragmentation in assessment methods across the field. By employing a comprehensive set of multidimensional criteria aligned with industry standards, the platform allows for systematic comparisons of encoding and decoding methods, revealing that no single codec excels in all performance dimensions. The findings highlight critical trade-offs in information density, success rate, runtime, and cost, which are essential for guiding the development of future DNA storage formats.
No single DNA storage codec is optimal across all performance metrics, revealing crucial trade-offs that could dictate the future of data preservation.
Background: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) data storage is a paradigm with great potential for ultra-dense and durable information preservation. However, the rapid proliferation of coding schemes, or codecs, each with their own design constraints and reporting practices, has led to a fragmented landscape that lacks a standardized comparative assessment. Methods: We developed an open-source, modular benchmarking platform that systematically integrates and evaluates state-of-the-art DNA storage encoding and decoding methods (codecs). Our approach uses a curated, diverse set of baseline data and applies multidimensional assessment criteria that are aligned with the consensus standard of the DNA Data Storage Alliance. These criteria include encoding/decoding throughput, computational efficiency, error correction performance across substitutions, insertions, and deletions, and cost efficiency. Results: The developed platform integrates standardized wrapper functions for encoding and decoding, allows for the integration of new methods, and automates reproducible evaluations with comprehensive visual and tabular reporting. Benchmarking both contemporary and classical codecs using their default parameters and multiple metrics demonstrates that no single algorithm is optimal across all evaluated dimensions. The trade-offs between information density, success rate, runtime, and cost are quantified and shown to be critical factors in the design of future-proof formats. Conclusions: Our work establishes a rigorously standardized, open-source evaluation framework that enables reproducible benchmarking, supports evidence-based codec selection, and provides the necessary foundation for translating DNA data storage from experimental research into deployable archival systems.