Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a symmetric audit of hierarchical procedural corpora to investigate component collapse due to merging relation types, building on previous findings by Guvenilir and Dogan. The authors reveal that certain corpora, specifically MyFixit and Doc2Dial, exhibit a distinct pattern where individual layers pass while their union fails under the same operational criteria. By providing a bounded measurement and audit of relation families, the research highlights the complexities of component structures without proposing new algorithms or causal claims.
Merging relation types can lead to component collapse, revealing critical limitations in hierarchical procedural corpora analysis.
Component-disjoint leakage control can group corpus units by content similarity, hierarchical membership, or both. Guvenilir and Dogan previously showed that merging relation types can create a giant component that obstructs splitting; we do not claim this phenomenon as new. We examine it through a symmetric audit of a content-near-duplicate layer, a common-container layer, and their union in a fixed panel of six hierarchical procedural corpora. MyFixit and Doc2Dial exhibit the individual-layer-pass/union-fail pattern under the same operational criteria. The resulting two-of-six fraction describes this deliberately constructed panel and is not a prevalence estimate. A prespecified bridge-specific predictor is associated with the pattern, but it is not distinguished from a registered union-density control; the panel therefore does not identify a bridge-specific mechanism. Secondary diagnostics bound the interpretation of threshold sensitivity, annotation coverage, and lexical cues without extending those findings beyond their recorded sources and definitions. The paper's contribution is a bounded measurement and audit: it keeps relation families visible, evaluates their individual and union component structures symmetrically, and reports negative cases and mechanism limits. It proposes neither a new splitting algorithm nor a general causal claim about relation unions.