Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the current compliance-focused governance of student data in learning analytics (LA) and introduces the LEAGUE framework, which emphasizes ethical considerations such as fairness and student agency. By synthesizing insights from various fields, the framework aims to enhance the educational purpose of data use beyond mere legal adherence. An illustrative case study on early alerts demonstrates the framework's practical application, highlighting its potential to foster transparency and meaningful engagement in educational settings.
Ethical governance of student data can transform learning analytics from mere compliance to a tool for empowerment and accountability.
The rapid growth of learning analytics (LA) in higher education has expanded institutional capacity to monitor engagement, predict academic difficulty, and target support using student data. While these practices offer important educational benefits, governance has often remained compliance-first, centered on meeting baseline legal requirements such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Legal compliance is necessary, but it does not by itself resolve questions of fairness, student agency, accountability, or educational purpose. This paper proposes the LEAGUE framework, a six-pillar model for ethical governance of student data in LA: Lawfulness, Equity, Agency, Governance, Utility, and Ethics by Design. The framework is developed through a conceptual synthesis of scholarship in learning analytics, educational data mining, data ethics, educational policy, value-sensitive design, and capability-oriented approaches to educational justice. Its practical value is demonstrated through an illustrative early alert case that shows how institutions can review learning analytics in a more transparent and educationally meaningful way.