Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Expectile n-step Q-learning (ENQ), which utilizes an asymmetric expectile loss to mitigate the pessimistic bias inherent in traditional n-step temporal-difference learning in off-policy reinforcement learning. By proving that the ENQ operator is a γ^n-contraction and demonstrating that its bias vanishes at the optimal action-value function under deterministic dynamics, the authors establish a theoretical foundation for their approach. Empirical results show that ENQ is competitive with Long-Horizon Q-learning while achieving higher training-step throughput and benefiting from ensemble methods across various tasks.
ENQ achieves higher training efficiency and reduced bias in off-policy reinforcement learning, outperforming traditional methods with a single hyperparameter tweak.
Multi-step returns accelerate reward propagation in off-policy reinforcement learning, but couple the evaluation of each decision to the suboptimal logged actions that follow it, inducing a pessimistic bias that grows with the horizon. We propose Expectile $n$-step Q-learning (ENQ), which replaces the symmetric $n$-step temporal-difference (TD) loss with an asymmetric expectile loss on the action-value error, with expectile level $τ$ as the only method-specific hyperparameter added beyond $n$-step TD. We prove that the ENQ operator is a $γ^{n}$-contraction. Under deterministic dynamics, at $τ=1$, its bias vanishes at the optimal action-value function $Q^*$ on covered in-support pairs, and the corresponding fixed point satisfies the separation-$n$ instance and its multiples of the lower-bound inequality used by Long-Horizon Q-learning (LQL). Under stochastic dynamics, the operator bias admits two-sided bounds with horizon-independent noise constants. Using a single expectile level $τ=0.8$ and a fixed backup horizon across 27 manipulation and navigation task instances, ENQ is competitive with LQL on aggregate, achieves higher measured training-step throughput in our profiling study, and benefits more from a ten-critic ensemble in a controlled scaling experiment.