Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces MODE, a novel method for generating mutually optimal recommendations in matching markets, addressing the balance between user satisfaction and concentration mitigation in reciprocal recommendation systems. By formulating the concept of "optimality of direct effects," the authors demonstrate that their approach not only enhances the quality of recommendations for individual users but also improves overall matching outcomes. Experiments reveal that MODE significantly outperforms existing methods in both mutual optimality and processing efficiency, leading to a greater expected number of successful matches.
Achieving mutual optimality in recommendations could transform how matching platforms balance user satisfaction and opportunity distribution.
Matching platforms such as job posting services and online dating platforms have become widely used over the past decade. For a matching platform to be successful, it is crucial to design appropriate reciprocal recommendation systems (RRSs) that consider the preferences of users on both sides (job candidates and employers) and prevent opportunities from being concentrated too heavily on a few popular users. However, prioritizing concentration mitigation too much can lead to recommending undesirable results to some individual users, resulting in their dissatisfaction. In this paper, we formulate the concept of ``optimality of direct effects''of the recommendation list for an individual user, given the recommendations to other users. Furthermore, we propose a novel method, MODE, that computes mutually optimal recommendations in direct effects. Experiments with synthetic and real-world data demonstrate that MODE surpasses other existing methods in terms of mutual optimality of direct effects, exhibits faster processing speeds, and enables a higher expected number of matches.