Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the reliability of parallel coding agents by implementing deterministic pre-write admission to address failure modes in locally valid changes. Through a confirmatory analysis of 30 feature pairs, the research demonstrates that static admission significantly improves integration success rates from 65.6% to 96.7% but at the cost of serializing 96.7% of executions. While dynamic admission showed selective serialization benefits, it ultimately resulted in a high failure rate due to undeclared scope issues, highlighting the trade-off between reliability and parallel execution efficiency.
Static admission boosts integration success rates to 96.7%, but at the expense of nearly complete serialization, raising questions about the practicality of parallel coding agents.
Parallel coding agents can produce locally valid changes that fail when combined. Claim Plane addresses this failure mode as deterministic pre-write admission over versioned change intents. This paper reports a confirmatory study on 30 frozen CooperBench feature pairs, balanced between 15 conflict and 15 clean labels, with three coder seeds, four coordination arms, and 360 completed executions. DeepSeek V4 Pro generated 60 feature-level planner declarations once; the declarations were frozen across all arms and coder seeds, while DeepSeek V4 Flash performed the coding work. Static Claim Plane raised pair pass from 23.3% under unconstrained parallel execution to 50.0%, a paired task-cluster difference of +26.7 percentage points (95% bootstrap CI 9.6 to 60.0), and raised integration success from 65.6% to 96.7%. On conflict-labeled pairs, pair pass rose from 6.7% to 60.0%. However, static admission serialized 96.7% of executions, including 93.3% of clean cases, and therefore recovered reliability largely by collapsing toward serial execution. Dynamic admission was more selective, serializing 66.7% of conflict cases and 13.3% of clean cases, but 46 of 90 executions failed closed on undeclared scope, reducing pair pass to 22.2%. Forty-five of those 46 blocks targeted files already present in the frozen declarations, indicating region undercoverage and insufficient amendment handling rather than wholly unknown files. The results support pre-write admission as a reliability mechanism, but they do not establish useful wall-clock parallel speedup: provider calls were physically sequential, and the conservative policy largely serialized the workload. The complete study artifacts, hashes, and clustered bootstrap analysis are publicly released for reproduction.