Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper models creativity in literary texts as a process of selective transformation rather than isolated invention, utilizing a multi-level framework that examines lexical, semantic, conceptual, structural, and narrative dimensions. By applying directional alignment and calibrated similarity measures, the authors analyze historical literary relationships to reveal how different pairs of texts preserve source structures at varying levels while diverging in others. The key finding is that these transformation profiles quantitatively characterize the dynamics of imitation and creative divergence in literature, offering new insights into the nature of creativity itself.
Different literary texts can preserve their source structure at varying levels while creatively diverging, revealing the nuanced dynamics of imitation in literature.
Creativity is often framed as the production of novelty, yet many cultural works emerge through transformation of earlier artifacts and not through isolated invention. Drawing on theories of imitation by Gabriel Tarde and James Mark Baldwin, this paper models creativity as selective transformation across multiple levels of textual representation. We introduce a multi-level framework that compares literary texts across lexical, semantic, conceptual, structural, and narrative dimensions using directional alignment and control calibrated similarity measures. Applying the model to historically documented literary relationships, we show that different pairs preserve source structure at different representational levels while diverging in others. These transformation profiles provide a quantitative method for characterizing how imitation persists and where creative divergence occurs within literary works.