Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey critically reviews uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods in deep learning, focusing on ensemble-based and approximate Bayesian approaches. It categorizes these methods into five families and provides a unified framework that distinguishes between the predictive distribution generation and the uncertainty measures used to summarize them. Key findings include a detailed examination of efficient ensemble approximations and the implications of various uncertainty measures, alongside a discussion of their performance and limitations in safety-critical applications.
Efficient ensemble approximations could revolutionize how we quantify uncertainty in deep learning, enhancing reliability in safety-critical domains.
The deployment of deep neural networks in safety-critical domains demands reliable estimates of predictive confidence, yet conventional architectures lack principled uncertainty quantification. This survey provides a structured, critical review of methods for Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in deep learning, scoped to ensemble-based and approximate Bayesian approaches and the measures used to summarize their outputs. Relative to existing UQ surveys, our contribution is depth on efficient ensemble approximations and single-pass methods, and a unified treatment that separates the method producing a predictive distribution from the measure that summarizes its uncertainty. We organize methods into five families: Bayesian neural networks, Monte Carlo Dropout, deep ensembles, efficient ensemble approximations, and last-layer or single-pass approaches. We situate adjacent work on evidential and prior networks, conformal prediction, and post-hoc calibration, together with the decision-time tasks of out-of-distribution detection and selective prediction. For each, we examine theoretical motivation, implementation, empirical performance, and limitations. We then review ensemble diversity theory and uncertainty measures and their decompositions, contrasting the entropy decomposition with pairwise divergence measures, and consolidate evaluation methodology so that our qualitative comparisons share a common basis. We close with a brief treatment of uncertainty in large language models and open research directions, including efficient epistemic measures for classification, last-layer diversity, diversity and calibration under shift, and hybrid architectures.