Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study critically evaluates the reliability of six leading generative AI systems in providing authentic Islamic knowledge, focusing on their performance across Qur'anic interpretation, Hadith, and Fiqh. By analyzing responses to fifty open-ended questions under real-world conditions in Australia and the UK, the research assesses domain accuracy, citation verification, and the prevalence of hallucinations. The findings reveal that while generative AI can assist in introductory Islamic learning, it falls short of being a trustworthy source for authoritative religious rulings, necessitating verification against primary sources and scholarly expertise.
Current generative AI systems can mislead in religious contexts, producing hallucinations and unverifiable references that challenge their use as authoritative sources in Islamic scholarship.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used by Muslims for religious guidance, Qur'anic interpretation, Hadith explanation, jurisprudential rulings, and Islamic education. Despite its growing adoption, there is limited empirical evidence on whether current AI systems provide authentic, verifiable, and trustworthy Islamic knowledge suitable for high-trust religious contexts. This study evaluates six leading generative AI systems using fifty realistic open-ended Islamic questions covering Qur'anic interpretation, Hadith, Fiqh, ethics, pastoral advice, and Madhhab-sensitive topics. Responses were collected under real-world conditions from participants in Australia and the United Kingdom and analysed using a mixed-method framework examining domain accuracy, citation verification, hallucinations, jurisprudential consistency, uncertainty handling, source provenance, and geographical variation. The study addresses four research questions: (1) How accurate and authentic are AI-generated responses across major Islamic knowledge domains? (2) To what extent do AI systems produce hallucinations, incomplete citations, or unverifiable religious references? (3) How consistently do models handle jurisprudential disagreement, Madhhab diversity, and uncertainty? (4) Are current AI systems sufficiently reliable for religious guidance, Islamic education, and scholarly research? Overall, current generative AI systems are valuable as assistive tools for introductory Islamic learning but should not be treated as authoritative sources for religious rulings or Islamic research without verification against authenticated primary sources and qualified scholarly expertise. This study provides one of the first comprehensive empirical evaluations of AI reliability within Islamic knowledge, offering practical guidance for researchers, educators, AI developers, and the wider Muslim community.