Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Contextual Deconvolution (CD), a two-stage estimator that optimizes demand sensing by separating promotional shocks from structural demand using a kernel-modulated banded operator. The method significantly reduces operational volatility, lowering safety stock and order variance while maintaining reliability in forecasts across a large dataset of SKUs. Evaluations show that CD outperforms eleven baseline models in terms of cross-sectional error dispersion, achieving a notable reduction in mis-forecasts while ensuring operational stability in inventory management.
Contextual Deconvolution slashes safety stock and order variance, outperforming traditional demand forecasting methods by prioritizing reliability over mere accuracy.
Machine learning demand forecasts optimize statistical accuracy yet leave excess operational volatility that inflates safety stock and amplifies the Bullwhip effect. We introduce \textbf{Contextual Deconvolution} (CD), a two-stage estimator that reframes demand sensing as a convex decomposition: a kernel-modulated banded operator separates transient promotion-driven shocks from a smooth structural baseline, and hierarchical partial pooling enables catalog-scale deployment without per-SKU training. The operator is data-derived, not imposed---it reduces to the identity wherever the promotional response is impulsive (most of M5, all of Favorita) and contributes only where genuine multi-day carryover exists, so the gains rest on the structural decomposition itself. Evaluating strictly out-of-sample on 30,490 M5 SKUs and 2,845 Favorita items, with calendar-aware baselines given CD's identical future calendar, we anchor the contribution on a full inventory-cost accounting: CD lowers safety stock, holding cost, and order variance but under-provisions event spikes, reducing total cost only when holding costs exceed $\sim$20\% of stockout costs (95\% CI $[17\%,25\%]$); otherwise it is an operational-stability and inventory-capital layer, not an expected-cost minimizer. Its accuracy contribution is reliability rather than central tendency: across eleven baselines, CD attains the lowest cross-sectional dispersion of per-SKU error and mis-forecasts by more than 200\% on 0.8\% of SKUs versus 9.9--20.6\% for every baseline, ranking first on both in all four M5 draws. Because the Variance Ratio and std-based safety stock are minimized by any sufficiently smooth forecast, we treat them as diagnostics, not objectives. A supporting analysis shows the learned demand operators are non-normal, yet CD's compact parametric kernel matches their operational performance interpretably.