Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper formalizes the classical usuli method of al-Sabr wa al-Taqsim through a set-theoretic approach to extract legal causes from closed chapters of jurisprudence. By developing a computational algorithm that processes a complete truth table of juristic verdicts, the authors successfully derive minimal operational rules while eliminating logically redundant attributes. The key finding demonstrates that the algorithm can efficiently compute admissible candidate causes for juristic evaluation, contingent on the availability of a finite concept vocabulary and complete ruling table.
A novel computational approach reveals minimal legal causes from juristic verdicts, streamlining the evaluation process in closed chapters of jurisprudence.
This paper presents a set-theoretic formalization of the classical usuli method of al-Sabr wa al-Taqsim (Examination and Division) for extracting legal causes ('ilal) within closed chapters of jurisprudence. A computational algorithm is introduced that extracts minimal operational rules from a truth table of juristic verdicts. The principal result is that, given a complete truth table for a closed chapter, the algorithm computes the minimal structural generators of the ruling and eliminates all logically redundant attributes. The resulting structures constitute admissible candidate causes for subsequent juristic evaluation. The framework is conditional upon the availability of a finite school-relative concept vocabulary and a complete ruling table for the chapter under investigation.